MOLI: BETAMore to Life
  • Search

    Advanced Search

  • (0)

  • Help

  • Browse Members

  • |Login

  • MOLI
  • / MOLI View
  • / Business
  • / So Much for Suburbs
  • MOLI Video
    • MOLI Roller
    • Park Bench Series
    • Control Freak
    • Fox & Calf
  • The MOLI View
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Fashion & Design
    • Life & Love
    • Business
    • Sports & Fitness
    • Technology
    • Travel & Leisure
    • Worthy Causes
  • Election Center
    • Candidates
    • Issues
    • The MOLI Roundup
    • On the Frontlines
    • Articles
    • Video & Podcasts
  • Small Business Center
    • Learning Center
    • Forums
      1. Ask the Experts
      2. Community Forum
    • Community
    • Business News
    • Video & Podcasts

MOLI VIEW™

Business

Back to Business | View Archives

  • . Digg It
  • . Sphere It
  • . E-mail This
  • . Save to del.icio.us
  • . Permanent Link
  • . Reddit

So Much for Suburbs

By Robert Levine/MOLI

Energy prices suddenly make cities look cleaner

In the past few months, I've had another reason to feel better about not living in the suburbs. My usual reason is that I grew up in the burbs – Stamford, Conn., to be exact – and I'm still traumatized by its ‘broad lawns and narrow minds.' And now, although New York City can seem like the most expensive place on earth, the suburbs suddenly don't seem like such a bargain.

Sure, I pay $3000 a month for a one-bedroom apartment. But my heating bill is zero, my electricity bill is usually about $50 and my transportation costs rarely top $30 a week, including a taxi or two. (I do own a car, but it's more of a hobby than a mode of transportation.) And although my rent and living expenses will go up, as everyone's do, they're not increasing nearly as quickly as those of people who live in the suburbs, who have big houses to heat and big cars to drive.

Fact is, amid its dirt and grime, New York City is relatively green, since most people use public transportation, take taxis for relatively short distances and live in large buildings that don't cost much to heat. Newer fancier exurbs, with their McMansions and SUVs, may be full of gardens and green spaces, but they're environmental disasters. So much energy is required to heat some of those houses – especially those with grand two-story entryways that allow the heat to rise – and they're so far away from anything that the people who live in them have to spend a good deal of money on gas. With houses spread so far apart, bicycles and public transportation simply aren't practical.

Previous Page  1  2  Next Page

Related Articles

  • Gas Tax Holiday Woes

    Even Cheney thinks it's a bad idea

  • Is Oil a Bubble?

    Part one of a special series

  • Greenspan Shrugs

    Libertarians believe responsibility is for everyone else

  • No Rules

    The answer to Wall Street's problems isn't less regulation

What People Are Saying…

Leave a Comment

  • Donnell

    23:20 EDT, 10.Jul.08

    It's so funny watching LA people try to get the hang of the train. They intellectually get that the train can make sense for them, but the suburban mindset of people who actually live in town prohibits them.
  • LuisM

    17:39 EDT, 12.Jun.08

    Yeah, Dead to Suburbia!!
  • Wendy Case

    12:38 EDT, 11.Jun.08

    I heard an NPR report recently that claimed that city dwellers actually leave a smaller carbon footprint than suburbanites.
  • HunterLiz

    17:33 EDT, 09.Jun.08

    Unfortunately this is true, more so to those who own SUVs. Most of my friends are spending around $80-$100 on gas weekly due to commute distance to work.

About Us Press Center Contact Us Frequently Asked Questions Terms of Service Privacy Policy Advertise International Feedback


WELCOME TO MOLI ® - Control Your Privacy™
© 2008 MOLI, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MOLI ®, COVIBE TECH™, MOLI KIDS™ AND MONEY AND LIVING™ ARE TRADEMARKS OF MAINSTREAM HOLDINGS, INC.
TERTIARY PRODUCTIONS ® IS A TRADEMARK OF TERTIARY PRODUCTIONS, LLC.