MOLI: BETAMore to Life
  • Search

    Advanced Search

  • (0)

  • Help

  • Browse Members

  • |Login

  • MOLI
  • / MOLI View
  • / Arts & Entertainment
  • / Blurring the Lines
  • MOLI Video
    • MOLI Roller
    • Park Bench Series
    • Control Freak
    • Fox & Calf
  • The MOLI View
    • Arts & Entertainment
    • Fashion & Design
    • Life & Love
    • Business
    • Sports & Fitness
    • Technology
    • Travel & Leisure
    • Worthy Causes
  • Election Center
    • Candidates
    • Issues
    • The MOLI Roundup
    • On the Frontlines
    • Articles
    • Video & Podcasts
  • Small Business Center
    • Learning Center
    • Forums
      1. Ask the Experts
      2. Community Forum
    • Community
    • Business News
    • Video & Podcasts

MOLI VIEW™

Arts & Entertainment

Back to Arts & Entertainment | View Archives

  • . Digg It
  • . Sphere It
  • . E-mail This
  • . Save to del.icio.us
  • . Permanent Link
  • . Reddit

Blurring the Lines

By Wendy Case/MOLI

Reality TV's fine line between objectivism and neglect

When the feature film The Truman Show came out in 1998, audiences were fascinated by its concept: A simple man (played by Jim Carrey) goes through his life believing that his wife, friends, family, and job are exactly what they appear to be — until he discovers that, since birth, he has been the star of an elaborate TV show where every element of his life has been a tightly-scripted plot and all of the people in it, including his wife, are hired talent.

By the time The Truman Show came out, reality TV was already firmly entrenched in American life. With COPS paving the way in 1989 and MTV's The Real World upping the ante in 1992, the genre was on the verge of a massive pop-culture explosion. At the time, issues of reality TV's moral turpitude were swallowed up by its novel, voyeuristic appeal.

But that's beginning to change. Though babies aren't being born to star in manipulated storylines yet, the idea doesn't seem so far-fetched anymore.

In a Monday New York Times story, reporter Jeremy W. Peters addressed some of the legal and ethical challenges presented by shows such as Intervention, which follows addicts and alcoholics from active addiction through the course of a planned intervention. The story focuses on the failure of many reality TV production crews to intervene when they see someone engaging in desperate or harmful behavior. The unspoken rule seems to be that of wildlife photographers: You are there to film the natural course of events, not to disrupt it.

Previous Page  1  2  Next Page

Related Articles

  • Honey, I Lost the Kids

    Bad parenting: a Hollywood tradition

  • Pimp Your Kids

    CBS reinvents "Lord of the Flies"

  • Push It Real Good

    Salt-N-Pepa throw down on reality TV

  • Pop Will Eat Itself

    Ad mascots are ABC's hairy hopefuls

What People Are Saying…

Leave a Comment

  • jfury

    16:02 EDT, 11.Oct.07

    I'm compelled to look up the legal definitions of "reckless endangerment" and "depraved indifference"; I've watched enough Law & Order to know that you can't just let someone perish. I think.
  • Carlos

    12:29 EDT, 10.Oct.07

    I don't like shows that exploit people. That is my call on the overall Reality TV boom. Although, when I heard that most people who were shown on COPS signed releases, my strong opinion split into two

About Us Press Center Contact Us Frequently Asked Questions Terms of Service Privacy Policy Advertise International Feedback


WELCOME TO MOLI ® - Control Your Privacy™
© 2008 MOLI, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MOLI ®, COVIBE TECH™, MOLI KIDS™ AND MONEY AND LIVING™ ARE TRADEMARKS OF MAINSTREAM HOLDINGS, INC.
TERTIARY PRODUCTIONS ® IS A TRADEMARK OF TERTIARY PRODUCTIONS, LLC.