Archive Most Active Posts Blogroll
2008
2007
January
    February
      March
        April
          May
            June
              July
                AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
                1. J
                2. F
                3. M
                4. A
                5. M
                6. J
                7. J
                8. A
                9. S
                10. O
                11. N
                12. D

                << >>

                1. S
                2. M
                3. T
                4. W
                5. T
                6. F
                7. S


                1. Bias and Balls and Strikes

                  22.Aug.07, 17:07 EDT Blog edited on: 01.Nov.07, 03:06 EDT
                  Bias in professional athletics is a subject of growing interest, perhaps the only place — in a setting stocked with outrageous workforce salaries — where organized sport remains a microcosm of society.

                  The latest comes from Daniel Hamermesh of the University of Texas, where his as-yet-unreleased study shows that about a percentage point of umpires' rulings in baseball is influenced by racism. Hamermesh's team studied 2.1 million major-league pitches and found a pattern of inaccurate calls. When pitchers and umps were the same race, the umpire was more likely to rule in the pitcher's favor.

                  Such disparities disappeared when stadiums swelled to capacity and on two-strike counts and full counts.

                  This study comes on the heels of this spring's study from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. It suggested that white NBAplayers get an undue benefit when fouls are called. Unlike the current scandal involving ref Tim Donaghy, David Stern's league was able to sweep this officiating problem under the rug.

                  Man, listen: For years we've heard intimations that the Oakland Raiders' black uniforms have led to their annually leading the NFL in penalties as much as any edict from management to play dirty. Now we've got the weight of academia behind what we've long suspected. So, I'm absolutely down with these studies. Enough of them and we might just end up with a meaningful understanding of what putting white hats on cowboys has done to us as a westerner society.
                Comments per Page: Display From:
                3 comments, on page 1 of 1 pages.
                1. Peter

                  20:54 EDT, 24.Aug.07
                  I'd agree more if there was a way to track the pitches that "just missed", either way, and then do the math.  Exclude obvious correct calls, even if they are disputed.  Baseball may be the most stat-crazy sport in the universe (otherwise why watch it?); wouldn't be surprised if you told me that the major leagues track data to that extent.
                2. Donnell

                  21:29 EDT, 23.Aug.07

                  Good point, sorta.

                  One percent comes out to a pitch per game. That's not nothing. Baseball's a game of edges, one where every pitch counts!If I were a manager, I might be tempted to take color into some account, especially during a stretch-run bullpen call.

                  And I do believe that a one percent difference that remains steady over 2.1 million pitches constitutes a pattern, however small.

                3. Peter

                  18:54 EDT, 23.Aug.07
                  One percent equals a "pattern"??  Not sure I'd want him as my statistics professor.  No doubt there is racism in US sports, just like there is in all aspects of US life, but this is a bit of a stretch.Â